Any suggestions on how an uncut trend can be started ?
I think it sort have been started. Education is the big thing though.
One of the main problems is that most men are circumsized very young, so it is in fact not their decision, but their parents. Therefore banning circumcision before the age of 18 might be a good start.
Hola Guys:
There is this gay guest house in Quepos, Costa Rica, which advertizes a 10% discount for any house guest that is uncut. In Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, at the Ramrod Bar guys that showed their foreskins received a free beer. Things like this can turn the tide for men to keep their foreskins and want others to put it back. I try to limit myself to only uncut guys, because its just an instant turn-on. :00000015:
Luis in Miami
Could you please share the name of the guest house in Quepos that offers a discount for uncircumcised guests? That sounds like a really cool idea. I looked on the net, but I haven’t found any of the gay guest houses in Quespos that mention that on their webistes.
Thanks for posting that.
Last June 19, 2006, By Biederone, “Therefore banning circumision before the age of 18 might be a good start” No No No, not 18 years old, better banning circumision for ever and ever, expect Balanitis problems but phimosis can cure by yourself with special tool called Glansie see www.glansie.com or cream steriod. Good circumision for Jew or muslims men or boys and some religion’s dogma but not for us. 
i agree, no one should be circumcised befor they can make the choice themselves, so the 18 year old rule would work. i have never met a cut man that when i asked him if he would have prefered to have his foreskin said no. i have asked all the men that have their foreskin if they like it and prefer to have their overhang of man skin and never have i had one say he would like to be circumcised! all us women love the feel of a uncircumcised cock compared to a cut cock!
I believe that the only quick way to stop these sick doctors mutilating perfectly healthy boy children is to start a trend in spreding the word that doctors who circumcise are pedophiles of the worst kind…Imagine having a demonstration outside their offices with banners to that effect… The tortur would soon stop.
Hello Guys and any gals out there, Scoop here , I have personally worked with the folks at NOCIRC and attended the symposiums they held . I also worked with Wayne r griffith who is the founder of NOHARMM and have seen first hand the restoration he did . many Yrs ago there was a fells by the name of Bud Berkely who published a book called “FORESKIN” some good reading in there as well. and Jim Biggelow , Who used to attend the meetings there in San Francisco , he published a book called “THE JOY OF UNCIRCUMCISION” and that as well is some great reading. But with NOCIRC and a new one thats just come along and there web site is www.mgmbill.org is doing just what you have talked about and there trying to get laws passed to stop circumcisions. That is well worth reading too. now with the elections and such and the folks all trying to jocky for the presidents position this may be a good time to let them know our feelings . Bill Richardson (hispanic) and the Gov of NM is my Gov and i hoping that mayby he will try to get some laws passed in Nm to stop the circ movement so contact your reps i know i will Scoop.
It isvery difficult especially with the new supposed AIDS protection that circumcision is supposed to give. Personally I think that use of a condom and careful sexual activity is far more effective. and that way you can keep the wonderful foreskin
Dale
FYI, there are numerous scientific studies done out there that prove that presence of foreskin has little to do with HIV/AIDS. There are totally circumcised muslim countries in Africa that have some of the highest HIV rates in the world. There are also almost totally uncircumcised countries where the HIV rates are equal to or less than Israel and the Arab Nations.
Mexico and the rest of Latin America are by far mostly uncircumcised and the rates there are no where as high as the US.
The downward trend in circumcisions started when insurance companies stopped paying for circumcisions, because they were considered “elective” surgery. Also educated “cut” males who realised the sexual benefits of being intact are not having their sons circumcised as often. Many “cut” men who have been “loosely” cut have started stretching the remnants of their foreskins (restoration) with very satisfying results both physically and sexually. Even a small minority of Jews are having only a “ritual” circumcision performed on their male children. In European countries the rate of circumcision is less than ten per cent. Women are beginning to realize that a man with a foreskin causes less irritation to their external genitals. So education is the answer. As an uncut man I frequently chat with cut men and without criticism frankly answer their questions about my intact cock. Now, many states are refusing to pay for circumcisions for Medicaid recipients saving millions of dollars in physician fees. Why should the public pay for elective surgery?
Agree that no guy should be cut before he is 18 unless there is a real medical need.
very few guys get cut because they need it, it is what their parents and doctor think is best.
Let us guys choose for ourselves.
Mark
I agree, but in USA the establishment has taken uncircumcised which is normal and made it the abnormal and circumcised the normal. Of course their are wrong but let’s face it that is what the majority of Americans think… I am always having to defend my uncut “abnormal” penis!!
Dale
It is a shame that most Americans are cut,
i much prefer to see a normal intact penis.
And it is better to have a NORMAL intact penis!!!
Dale
-
The law should deem circumcision without anesthesia to be a form of assault and battery.
-
Insurance companies should not cover circumcision unless there is a clear medical problem that cannot be treated in a less invasive way.
-
Cosmetic circumcision should be illegal before one is 18. Better yet, 21.
-
The foreskin is not relevant to AIDS in the USA. If it were, there would be a higher proportion of Europeans suffering from AIDS. In fact,
the circumcised USA has the highest death rate from AIDS of any advanced country. -
The foreskin is perfectly sanitary is you wash under it every day (which is trivial to do), and use a condom when fooling around.
-
We need to think more about the positives of the foreskin for men. It does a lot more than make docking possble:
- The foreskin does much more than protect the glans, which I think is overrated. The tip of the foreskin, the
frenulum, and the part of the inner foreskin anchoring the frenulum are, in my opinion, the most sensitive parts of the penis. Circ discards all these parts; - It facilitates masturbation and handjobs;
- It makes possible intercourse between the upper thighs;
- Oral is fine if you first rinse off the glans with tap water;
- The foreskin spreads precum around in a nice way;
BTW, I’ve gone from being a bit too sensitive and coming too quickly, to delayed ejaculation. If I were cut, I wonder if I wouldn’t
have to face being damn near unable to come.
- Young American women are discovering the foreskin and talking about it, via web anonymity and face to face among close friends.
Women can study the foreskin carefully at safe web sites such as Wikipedia and the many anti-circ web sites. I am agnostic about whether
the foreskin matters for vaginal intercourse, but some American women post that the 1-2 intact partners they’ve had (typically Latinos
or immigrants to the USA) are a defining moment in their lifetime sexual experience. There are straight women who are foreskin fetishists,
and I bet their numbers are set to rise.
American routine infant circumcision will die quickly when American mothers decide that the foreskin promotes the female orgasm. That
doesn’t have to be true, only believed. Many women are ripe to believe this, because many women have chronic difficulties enjoying vaginal
intercourse.
Scoop here :… YES! work with groups like www.nocirc.org or www.noharmm.org and for sure please support write letters and show how stoping the operations can save dollars here contact www.mgmbill.org its a group out of San diego CA who are writing bills that folks at the state and US house in washington can pass to stop such things i heard there is a bill tied in with the United nations that may also help stop childhood circs here in the US but MGM Bill is the start and education is the other tool . scoop
Actually it is the feminist movement and the natural childbirth/mid-wiffery business in Australia has been one of biggest lobby groups who quietly have WOMEN well aware that cutting a new born is bad, bad, bad. Natural is their motto. Medicare the universal health care sure doesn’t cover circumcision for 15 years or more, so the tide has shifted - a movement for ‘natural’ is winning the day.